 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Divorce Lawyers Reno Sparks NV, Family Law Attorneys Nevada, Child Custody Spousal Support Lawyer, Men's Fathers Rights Attorney
Attorney Marilyn D. York [top line also goes on "Keywords" and "Descriptions" under Format menu] DIVORCE MISTAKES DURING THE DIVORCE Fathers' Father's Rights Lawyer Divorce Mistakes 20. Not waiting until your divorce is concluded before engaging in a new relationship. At the very least, do not talk about any new relationship with your spouse or ‘ex’.
2005 California Family Code Sections 3421-3430 CHAPTER 2. JURISDICTION FAMILY.CODE 3421. (a) Except as otherwise provided in Section 3424, a court of this state has jurisdiction to make an initial child custody determination only if any of the following are true: (1) This state is the home state of the child on the date of the commencement of the proceeding, or was the home state of the child within six months before the commencement of the proceeding and the child is absent from this state but a parent or person acting as a parent continues to live in this state. (2) A court of another state does not have jurisdiction under paragraph (1), or a court of the home state of the child has declined to exercise jurisdiction on the grounds that this state is the more appropriate forum under Section 3427 or 3428, and both of the following are true: (A) The child and the child's parents, or the child and at least one parent or a person acting as a parent, have a significant connection with this state other than mere physical presence. (B) Substantial evidence is available in this state concerning the child's care, protection, training, and personal relationships. (3) All courts having jurisdiction under paragraph (1) or (2) have declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that a court of this state is the more appropriate forum to determine the custody of the child under Section 3427 or 3428. (4) No court of any other state would have jurisdiction under the criteria specified in paragraph (1), (2), or (3). (b) Subdivision (a) is the exclusive jurisdictional basis for making a child custody determination by a court of this state. (c) Physical presence of, or personal jurisdiction over, a party or a child is not necessary or sufficient to make a child custody determination. 3422. (a) Except as otherwise provided in Section 3424, a court of this state that has made a child custody determination consistent with Section 3421 or 3423 has exclusive, continuing jurisdiction over the determination until either of the following occurs: (1) A court of this state determines that neither the child, nor the child and one parent, nor the child and a person acting as a parent have a significant connection with this state and that substantial evidence is no longer available in this state concerning the child's care, protection, training, and personal relationships. (2) A court of this state or a court of another state determines that the child, the child's parents, and any person acting as a parent do not presently reside in this state. (b) A court of this state that has made a child custody determination and does not have exclusive, continuing jurisdiction under this section may modify that determination only if it has jurisdiction to make an initial determination under Section 3421. 3423. Except as otherwise provided in Section 3424, a court of this state may not modify a child custody determination made by a court of another state unless a court of this state has jurisdiction to make an initial determination under paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 3421 and either of the following determinations is made: (a) The court of the other state determines it no longer has exclusive, continuing jurisdiction under Section 3422 or that a court of this state would be a more convenient forum under Section 3427. (b) A court of this state or a court of the other state determines that the child, the child's parents, and any person acting as a parent do not presently reside in the other state. 3424. (a) A court of this state has temporary emergency jurisdiction if the child is present in this state and the child has been abandoned or it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because the child, or a sibling or parent of the child, is subjected to, or threatened with, mistreatment or abuse. (b) If there is no previous child custody determination that is entitled to be enforced under this part and a child custody proceeding has not been commenced in a court of a state having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive, a child custody determination made under this section remains in effect until an order is obtained from a court of a state having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive. If a child custody proceeding has not been or is not commenced in a court of a state having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive, a child custody determination made under this section becomes a final determination, if it so provides and this state becomes the home state of the child. (c) If there is a previous child custody determination that is entitled to be enforced under this part, or a child custody proceeding has been commenced in a court of a state having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive, any order issued by a court of this state under this section must specify in the order a period that the court considers adequate to allow the person seeking an order to obtain an order from the state having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive. The order issued in this state remains in effect until an order is obtained from the other state within the period specified or the period expires. (d) A court of this state that has been asked to make a child custody determination under this section, upon being informed that a child custody proceeding has been commenced in, or a child custody determination has been made by, a court of a state having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive, shall immediately communicate with the other court. A court of this state which is exercising jurisdiction pursuant to Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive, upon being informed that a child custody proceeding has been commenced in, or a child custody determination has been made by, a court of another state under a statute similar to this section shall immediately communicate with the court of that state to resolve the emergency, protect the safety of the parties and the child, and determine a period for the duration of the temporary order. (e) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting subdivision (a) that the grounds on which a court may exercise temporary emergency jurisdiction be expanded. It is further the intent of the Legislature that these grounds include those that existed under Section 3403 of the Family Code as that section read on December 31, 1999, particularly including cases involving domestic violence. 3425. (a) Before a child custody determination is made under this part, notice and an opportunity to be heard in accordance with the standards of Section 3428 must be given to all persons entitled to notice under the law of this state as in child custody proceedings between residents of this state, any parent whose parental rights have not been previously terminated, and any person having physical custody of the child. (b) This part does not govern the enforceability of a child custody determination made without notice or an opportunity to be heard. (c) The obligation to join a party and the right to intervene as a party in a child custody proceeding under this part are governed by the law of this state as in child custody proceedings between residents of this state. 3426. (a) Except as otherwise provided in Section 3424, a court of this state may not exercise its jurisdiction under this chapter if, at the time of the commencement of the proceeding, a proceeding concerning the custody of the child has been commenced in a court of another state having jurisdiction substantially in conformity with this part, unless the proceeding has been terminated or is stayed by the court of the other state because a court of this state is a more convenient forum under Section 3427. (b) Except as otherwise provided in Section 3424, a court of this state, before hearing a child custody proceeding, shall examine the court documents and other information supplied by the parties pursuant to Section 3429. If the court determines that a child custody proceeding has been commenced in a court in another state having jurisdiction substantially in accordance with this part, the court of this state shall stay its proceeding and communicate with the court of the other state. If the court of the state having jurisdiction substantially in accordance with this part does not determine that the court of this state is a more appropriate forum, the court of this state shall dismiss the proceeding. (c) In a proceeding to modify a child custody determination, a court of this state shall determine whether a proceeding to enforce the determination has been commenced in another state. If a proceeding to enforce a child custody determination has been commenced in another state, the court may do any of the following: (1) Stay the proceeding for modification pending the entry of an order of a court of the other state enforcing, staying, denying, or dismissing the proceeding for enforcement. (2) Enjoin the parties from continuing with the proceeding for enforcement. (3) Proceed with the modification under conditions it considers appropriate. 3427. (a) A court of this state that has jurisdiction under this part to make a child custody determination may decline to exercise its jurisdiction at any time if it determines that it is an inconvenient forum under the circumstances and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum. The issue of inconvenient forum may be raised upon motion of a party, the court's own motion, or request of another court. (b) Before determining whether it is an inconvenient forum, a court of this state shall consider whether it is appropriate for a court of another state to exercise jurisdiction. For this purpose, the court shall allow the parties to submit information and shall consider all relevant factors, including: (1) Whether domestic violence has occurred and is likely to continue in the future and which state could best protect the parties and the child. (2) The length of time the child has resided outside this state. (3) The distance between the court in this state and the court in the state that would assume jurisdiction. (4) The degree of financial hardship to the parties in litigating in one forum over the other. (5) Any agreement of the parties as to which state should assume jurisdiction. (6) The nature and location of the evidence required to resolve the pending litigation, including testimony of the child. (7) The ability of the court of each state to decide the issue expeditiously and the procedures necessary to present the evidence. (8) The familiarity of the court of each state with the facts and issues in the pending litigation. (c) If a court of this state determines that it is an inconvenient forum and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum, it shall stay the proceedings upon condition that a child custody proceeding be promptly commenced in another designated state and may impose any other condition the court considers just and proper. (d) A court of this state may decline to exercise its jurisdiction under this part if a child custody determination is incidental to an action for dissolution of marriage or another proceeding while still retaining jurisdiction over the dissolution of marriage or other proceeding. (e) If it appears to the court that it is clearly an inappropriate forum, the court may require the party who commenced the proceeding to pay, in addition to the costs of the proceeding in this state, necessary travel and other expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the other parties or their witnesses. Payment is to be made to the clerk of the court for remittance to the proper party. 3428. (a) Except as otherwise provided in Section 3424 or by any other law of this state, if a court of this state has jurisdiction under this part because a person seeking to invoke its jurisdiction has engaged in unjustifiable conduct, the court shall decline to exercise its jurisdiction unless one of the following are true: (1) The parents and all persons acting as parents have acquiesced in the exercise of jurisdiction. (2) A court of the state otherwise having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive, determines that this state is a more appropriate forum under Section 3427. (3) No court of any other state would have jurisdiction under the criteria specified in Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive. (b) If a court of this state declines to exercise its jurisdiction pursuant to subdivision (a), it may fashion an appropriate remedy to ensure the safety of the child and prevent a repetition of the unjustifiable conduct, including staying the proceeding until a child custody proceeding is commenced in a court having jurisdiction under Sections 3421 to 3423, inclusive. (c) If a court dismisses a petition or stays a proceeding because it declines to exercise its jurisdiction pursuant to subdivision (a), it shall assess against the party seeking to invoke its jurisdiction necessary and reasonable expenses including costs, communication expenses, attorney's fees, investigative fees, expenses for witnesses, travel expenses, and child care during the course of the proceedings, unless the party from whom fees are sought establishes that the assessment would be clearly inappropriate. The court may not assess fees, costs, or expenses against this state unless authorized by law other than this part. (d) In making a determination under this section, a court shall not consider as a factor weighing against the petitioner any taking of the child, or retention of the child after a visit or other temporary relinquishment of physical custody, from the person who has legal custody, if there is evidence that the taking or retention of the child was a result of domestic violence against the petitioner, as defined in Section 6211. 3429. (a) In a child custody proceeding, each party, in its first pleading or in an attached affidavit, shall give information, if reasonably ascertainable, under oath as to the child's present address or whereabouts, the places where the child has lived during the last five years, and the names and present addresses of the persons with whom the child has lived during that period. However, where there are allegations of domestic violence or child abuse, any addresses of the party alleging violence or abuse and of the child which are unknown to the other party are confidential and may not be disclosed in the pleading or affidavit. The pleading or affidavit must state whether the party: (1) Has participated, as a party or witness or in any other capacity, in any other proceeding concerning the custody of, or visitation with, the child and, if so, identify the court, the case number, and the date of the child custody determination, if any. (2) Knows of any proceeding that could affect the current proceeding, including proceedings for enforcement and proceedings relating to domestic violence, protective orders, termination of parental rights, and adoptions and, if so, identify the court, the case number, and the nature of the proceeding. (3) Knows the names and addresses of any person not a party to the proceeding who has physical custody of the child or claims rights of legal custody or physical custody of, or visitation with, the child and, if so, the names and addresses of those persons. (b) If the information required by subdivision (a) is not furnished, the court, upon motion of a party or its own motion, may stay the proceeding until the information is furnished. (c) If the declaration as to any of the items described in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (a) is in the affirmative, the declarant shall give additional information under oath as required by the court. The court may examine the parties under oath as to details of the information furnished and other matters pertinent to the court's jurisdiction and the disposition of the case. (d) Each party has a continuing duty to inform the court of any proceeding in this or any other state that could affect the current proceeding. 3430. (a) In a child custody proceeding in this state, the court may order a party to the proceeding who is in this state to appear before the court in person with or without the child. The court may order any person who is in this state and who has physical custody or control of the child to appear in person with the child. (b) If a party to a child custody proceeding whose presence is desired by the court is outside this state, the court may order that a notice given pursuant to Section 3408 include a statement directing the party to appear in person with or without the child and informing the party that failure to appear may result in a decision adverse to the party. (c) The court may enter any orders necessary to ensure the safety of the child and of any person ordered to appear under this section. (d) If a party to a child custody proceeding who is outside this state is directed to appear under subdivision (b) or desires to appear personally before the court with or without the child, the court may require another party to pay reasonable and necessary travel and other expenses of the party so appearing and of the child.
Law Directories and backlink noteworthy sites:
https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/89509-nv-marilyn-york-116198.html https://www.avvo.com/search/lawyer_search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=family+law&loc=Reno%2C+NV https://www.avvo.com/search/lawyer_search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=divorce&loc=Reno%2C+NV https://www.avvo.com/find-a-lawyer https://www.avvo.com/profile/dashboard?logged_in=true
https://www.lawyers.com/reno/nevada/attorney-marilyn-d-york-inc-3187791-f/
https://www.martindale.com/reno/nevada/marilyn-york-130955-a/ https://www.martindale.com/search/attorneys-law-firms-articles/?term=Family%20Law%20near%20reno%20nv https://www.martindale.com/areas-of-law/family-law-lawyers/
https://www.nolo.com/lawyers/profile/attorney-marilyn-d-york-inc https://www.nolo.com/lawyers/family/nevada
https://www.yelp.com/search?find_desc=divorce+attorney&find_loc=Reno%2C+NV&ns=1 https://www.yelp.com/biz/law-office-of-marilyn-d-york-reno?osq=divorce+attorney
https://speakerhub.com/speaker/marilyn-yorkmarilyn-york
https://www.nvbar.org/find-a-lawyer/?usearch=marilyn+york Nevada State Bar
http://wcbar.org/lawyers/ Washoe County Bar
https://www.linkedin.com/in/marilyn-d-york-08967432/ Linkedin.com
https://www.ktvn.com/story/41111809/someone-2-know-marilyn-york KTVN Channel 2 News (CBS)
Google Reviews Yelp Reviews Lawyers.com Reviews Martendale.com Avvo.com Reviews
Mapquest.com eLocal.com localDatabase.com WhereToApp.com yellowpagecity.com
yasabe.com ablocal.com 2findlocal.com local.com superlawyers.com
/www.marilynyork.net/NevadaDivorceLawyersAttorneysCertifiedFamilyLawSpecialistsdoingChildSupportCustody.php NEVADA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCTfor attorneys including a Nevada attorney directory
http://www.marilynyork.net/NevadaBarTextDivorceLawyersAttorneysCertifiedFamilyLawSpecialistsdoingChildSupportCustody_000.php
http://www.marilynyork.net/NRS125ANevadaDivorceLawyersAttorneysCertifiedFamilyLawSpecialistsdoingChildSupportCustody.php NRS 125A child custody visitation
http://www.marilynyork.net/NRS125BNevadaDivorceLawyersAttorneysCertifiedFamilyLawSpecialistsdoingChildSupportCustody.php NRS 125B child custody visitation
http://www.marilynyork.net/NRS125CNevadaDivorceLawyersAttorneysCertifiedFamilyLawSpecialistsdoingChildSupportCustody.php NRS 125C child custody visitation
Calling family lawyers at marilynyork.net NOW may save money over calling family lawyers at marilynyork.net later. See Marilyn York TV Commercials on youtube.com - youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtlIhxVwjaOdAq5Pl8rEbNw/videos?view=0&sort=p&flow=grid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05Z4eWmtFzo Divorce Attorney Marilyn York TV Ad "Men Blindsided by Divorce"; Men's Fathers' Rights Child Custody Family Law Lawyer Reno Sparks NV Nevada. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VH3bj-RdLA Divorce Attorney Marilyn York TV Ad "Can't Go Home"; Men's Fathers' Rights Child Custody Family Law Lawyer Reno Sparks NV Nevada.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZ3oHscG6Bo Divorce Attorney Marilyn York TV Ad "Viagra Parody a"; Men's Fathers' Rights Child Custody Family Law Lawyer Reno Sparks NV Nevada.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fnrzb9b6l_o&t=39s Tosh.O (link below) has guest Divorce Attorney Marilyn York per Fox 11 interview; Reno Sparks Family Law Lawyer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlQ608REn6U Divorce Attorney Marilyn York TV Ad "Women Hater"; Men's Fathers' Rights Child Custody Family Law Lawyer Reno Sparks NV Nevada.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ogb_KqhivP4 Divorce Attorney Marilyn York TV Ad "Mean Girl Talk"; Men's Fathers' Rights Child Custody Family Law Lawyer Reno Sparks NV Nevada.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktucJ1ZTRNs Divorce Attorney Marilyn York TV Ad "Outs Parents"; Men's Fathers' Rights Child Custody Family Law Lawyer Reno Sparks NV Nevada.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEduvmNxXMI Divorce Attorney Marilyn York TV Ad "Shut Up Stupid"; Men's Fathers' Rights Child Custody Family Law Lawyer Reno Sparks NV Nevada.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3U-X6aG2NgA Divorce Attorney Marilyn York TV Ad "Duct Tape It"; Men's Fathers' Rights Child Custody Family Law Lawyer Reno Sparks NV Nevada.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqINBFPH9uI&t=6s Divorce Attorney Marilyn York "Hated Family Law Lawyers"; Men's Fathers' Rights Family Law Lawyer Reno Sparks NV
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvPj8dB-eRY Divorce Attorney Marilyn York TV Ad "Viagra Parody"; Men's Fathers' Rights Child Custody Family Law Lawyer Reno Sparks NV Nevada.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdTen8gi3XQ Divorce Attorney Marilyn York "Child Custody"; Reno Sparks Family Lawyer Custody Mens Fathers Rights. See TV Ads
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciIroO9AyPg Divorce Attorney Marilyn York "Gets Soaked"; Reno Sparks Men's Fathers' Rights Custody Family Law Lawyer. TV Ads
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7xY5PbZZgg Divorce Attorney Marilyn York "Men's Alimony";Reno Sparks Family Lawyer Custody Mens Fathers Rights. See TV Ads
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQQKRhwn1oc Reno Divorce & Family Law Attorney Marilyn York interview on Plush Life. Reno Sparks Mens Fathers Rights Lawyer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_FnxFaW5AA Divorce Attorney Marilyn York TV Ad "The Therapist"; Men's Fathers' Rights Child Custody Family Law Lawyer Reno Sparks NV Nevada.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yBd6OTmnKg Divorce Attorney Marilyn York "Common Law"; Reno Sparks Family Lawyer Custody Men's Fathers' Rights. See TV Ads
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUJ5AJeEEsE Divorce Attorney Marilyn York "Prenuptials"; Reno Sparks Family Lawyer Custody Men's Fathers' Rights. See TV Ads
You can learn a lot from other divorce attorneys websites, here are some:
LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN PERSKIN, Divorce Lawyers | Family Law | Child ... Divorce Lawyer New York, NY - Law Offices of Lisa Beth Older Divorce Lawyer in New York We the People of 14 St Patricia Ann Fersch Family Law Google top organic search results: Divorce Lawyer New York, NY - Divorce Attorney New York, NY
Divorce Lawyers Reno Sparks NV, Family Law Attorneys Nevada, Child Custody Spousal Support Lawyer, Men's Fathers Rights Attorney Above goes in all "Keywords and Description" fields of all pages; but can't do this when originating a page.
Below page names get changed, example: Mistakes2DivorceLawyersRenoSparksNVFamilyLawAttorneysNevadaChildCustodySpousalSupportLawyerMensFathersRightsAttorney
1 Best Local Top Divorce Court Attorneys near Reno Sparks NV (Nevada) Divorce Mistakes 2 marilynyork.net/divorce.php template 2 Best Local Top Divorce Court Attorney near Reno Sparks NV (Nevada) Divorce Mistakes BW1 7 Best Local Top Divorce Court Attorneys near Reno Sparks NV (Nevada) Divorce Mistakes DM3 34 Best Local Top DivorceCourt nearReno Sparks NV (Nevada) Divorce Mistakes 27 67 Best Local Top divorce Court near Reno Sparks NV (Nevada) Divorce Mistakes 60 85 Best Local Top men's Mens rights near Reno Sparks NV (Nevada) Divorce Mistakes 78 86 Best Local Top men's Mens rights attorney near Reno Sparks NV (Nevada) Divorce Mistakes 79 100 Best Local Top divorce Court near Reno Sparks NV (Nevada) Divorce Mistakes 93 TheMarilynYorkShow.com Become a Fan of Marilyn York on Facebook. Click HERE. Divorce Lawyers Reno, Las Vegas, Incline Village; Attorneys Carson City, Sparks NV Nevada, Lawyer Fallon, Henderson Attorney Fernley, Yerington, Minden & GardnervilleCarson City Divorce Attorney Carson City Fallon Divorce Attorney Fallon Fernley Divorce Attorney Fernley Incline Village Divorce Attorney Incline Village Henderson Divorce Attorney Henderson Las Vegas Divorce Attorney Las Vegas Minden Divorce Attorney Minden Gardnerville Divorce Attorney Gardnerville Sparks Divorce Attorney Sparks Yerington Divorce Attorney Yerington Carson City, Reno, Fallon, Minden, Incline Village, Gardnerville, Sparks, Fernley, Yerington Divorce Lawyers Reno Sparks Question 13 Fallon, Sparks, Minden, Fernley, Yerington, Incline Village, Carson City, Reno, Gardnerville Divorce Lawyers Reno Sparks Question 12 Minden, Yerington, Reno, Gardnerville, Sparks, Incline Village, Fernley, Fallon, Carson City Divorce Lawyers Reno Sparks Question 14 Gardnerville, Incline Village, Carson City, Fernley, Reno, Fallon, Yerington, Sparks, Minden Divorce Lawyers Reno Sparks Question 19 Fernley, Gardnerville, Reno, Yerington, Carson City, Sparks, Incline Village, Minden, Fallon Divorce Lawyers Reno Sparks Question 21 Yerington, Reno, Fernley, Fallon, Sparks, Minden, Incline Village, Gardnerville, Carson City Divorce Lawyers Reno Sparks Question 26 Fallon, Carson City, Sparks, Incline Village, Gardnerville, Yerington, Minden, Reno, Fernley Divorce Lawyers Reno Sparks Question 31 Gardnerville, Sparks, Minden, Fernley, Fallon, Incline Village, Carson City, Reno, Yerington Divorce Lawyers Reno Sparks Question 38 Minden, Incline Village, Reno, Yerington, Gardnerville, Fernley, Sparks, Fallon, Carson City Divorce Lawyers Reno Sparks Question 52 Yerington, Reno, Fernley, Minden, Sparks, Carson City, Incline Village, Fallon, Gardnerville Divorce Lawyers Reno Sparks Question 92
We serve - Washoe County: Reno NV (Nevada), Sparks NV (Nevada), Incline Village NV (Nevada)etc. Carson City County: Carson City NV (Nevada) Churchill County: Fallon NV (Nevada), etc. Douglas County: Minden NV (Nevada), Gardnerville NV (Nevada), etc. Lyon County: Fernley NV (Nevada), Yerington NV (Nevada), etc. Copyright 2010 R. W. York for Marilyn D. York. All Rights Reserved. Yes!! You have to ask me if you want to copy. |
||||||||||||||||
 | ||||||||||||||||